|
Post by Nightspade on Apr 23, 2010 15:57:48 GMT -5
So you would not want a new series of Stand Alone Complex, correct? Why would I? GITS:SAC and 2ndGig are great on their own. The movie rocks. I have no need nor desire for more.
|
|
|
Post by millinniummany3k on Apr 23, 2010 16:05:07 GMT -5
Hi Twila Starla, I Respect everyones opinion on wanting a Fifth Season of Kim Possible or not. For those who are satisified with just the Four Seasons of Kim Possible, they have it easy, they can just walk away. But some don't, instead they make Threads like this with the Title of "Kim Possible picked up for FIFTH SEASON!", when it is not true. They then make fun of the people coming here with, "HA! HA! Made You Look". Then Teasing some of them for still wanting a Fifth Season of Kim Possible. NOT COOL! Respect is earned, not given. Exactly. Fans who don't want a fifth season because they feel the quality will drop and the show as whole will be poorly remembered, we welcome those type of people. We want those type of people. Trolls who pull these type of stunts for the lulz on the other hand, they are breaking the forum rules, they have no place here, they are not welcome here and we don't want them here.
|
|
|
Post by Nightspade on Apr 23, 2010 16:08:47 GMT -5
Hi Twila Starla, I Respect everyones opinion on wanting a Fifth Season of Kim Possible or not. For those who are satisified with just the Four Seasons of Kim Possible, they have it easy, they can just walk away. But some don't, instead they make Threads like this with the Title of "Kim Possible picked up for FIFTH SEASON!", when it is not true. They then make fun of the people coming here with, "HA! HA! Made You Look". Then Teasing some of them for still wanting a Fifth Season of Kim Possible. NOT COOL! Respect is earned, not given. Exactly. Fans who don't want a fifth season because they feel the quality will drop and the show as whole will be poorly remembered, we welcome those type of people. We want those type of people. Trolls who pull these type of stunts for the lulz on the other hand, they are breaking the forum rules, they have no place here, they are not welcome here and we don't want them here. lol, yeah, about breaking the forum rules: ronstoppable.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=polls&action=display&thread=10923&page=1To quote: **Important note**
DON’T MAKE YOUR SIGNATURE TOO BIG! On this forum, you have to keep your signature smaller than this:
Stick to the guideline or you’ll be getting a call from one of our moderators!
|
|
|
Post by Twila Starla on Apr 23, 2010 16:11:46 GMT -5
But if he should respect the opinions of people who want a fifth season, then shouldn't you respect the opinions of people who don't? There is a marked difference between genuinely believing that quality would go down the further the series goes and going out of your way to upset the fanbase. So he pulled a stupid prank, big deal! The board has been so dead lately, sometimes a little goofiness helps traffic. If you were mature as you asked him to be, you wouldn't have even posted on this thread. And if you would have, it would've been a logical, well thought out argument, not "ignore the troll" over and over.
|
|
|
Post by Nightspade on Apr 23, 2010 16:15:42 GMT -5
There is a marked difference between genuinely believing that quality would go down the further the series goes and going out of your way to upset the fanbase. So he pulled a stupid prank, big deal! The board has been so dead lately, sometimes a little goofiness helps traffic. If you were mature as you asked him to be, you wouldn't have even posted on this thread. And if you would have, it would've been a logical, well thought out argument, not "ignore the troll" over and over. To clarify, 'Ignore the Troll' over and over wasn't what he had written originally. He was being childish and openly participating in the flame war. Then he lost his nerve and went back and edited his posts so they just said 'Ignore the Troll.' THEN he tried to claim to be the mature one. Yeah, I laughed my a ss off. EDIT: Spelling fail on my part.
|
|
|
Post by millinniummany3k on Apr 23, 2010 16:17:06 GMT -5
I believe it. I believe it. I completely believe it, believe me. Hmph, sounded like Motor Ed for a second. I'll be taking a very close look at that one over the next couple of days, particularly of any that feature Joss.
|
|
|
Post by Twila Starla on Apr 23, 2010 16:19:25 GMT -5
So he pulled a stupid prank, big deal! The board has been so dead lately, sometimes a little goofiness helps traffic. If you were mature as you asked him to be, you wouldn't have even posted on this thread. And if you would have, it would've been a logical, well thought out argument, not "ignore the troll" over and over. To clarify, 'Ignore the Troll' over and over wasn't what he had written originally. He was being childish and openly participating in the flame war. Then he lost his nerve and went back and edited his posts so they just saide 'Ignore the Troll.' THEN he tried to claim to be the mature one. Yeah, I laughed my naco off. Wooooow... so, this is even more childish than I first thought. xD Well, it's given me an interest in the boards again, so it can't be all bad!
|
|
|
Post by Nightspade on Apr 23, 2010 16:22:25 GMT -5
I'm just wondering when he's going to change his signature so he won't keep breaking those FORUM RULES he cares so much about.
|
|
|
Post by millinniummany3k on Apr 23, 2010 16:24:01 GMT -5
Yes, I did take the troll bait and acted foolish, but I have seen the error of my ways in giving trolls any attention whatsoever.
|
|
|
Post by Nightspade on Apr 23, 2010 16:27:26 GMT -5
Yes, I did take the troll bait and acted foolish, but I have seen the error of my ways in giving trolls any attention whatsoever. So, you've decided to not give attention to the trolls but still post in the troll thread? Okay.
|
|
|
Post by lordvictorino on Apr 23, 2010 18:24:45 GMT -5
I'm just wondering when he's going to change his signature so he won't keep breaking those FORUM RULES he cares so much about. Hi Nightspade, The Forum Rules seem to be more like Guildlines now a days, then actual Rules. Since Dracko19 left, seems that alot of Rules have not been Inforced for a long time. And if memory serves me right, the last time someone make a False Thread about a Show that got renewed, but it turned out to be a lie, that person got Suspended for a Month or so from the Board. So, I would be very careful what you wish for. For it may just come True. And that goes for the Rules, as well as, the Title of this Thread. You Never Know, Stranger Things Have Happened. But with all that said, it's up to the Mods here to Inforce the Rules or not, and to Punish anyone on the Board as they see fit or not. Please and Thank You, Tony M. Victorino
|
|
|
Post by Zephyr on Apr 23, 2010 18:40:04 GMT -5
So you lack the maturity to allow people to want a fifth season? But if he should respect the opinions of people who want a fifth season, then shouldn't you respect the opinions of people who don't? With all do respect Twila, I thank you for the defense, but it is unwarranted as my intentions are not righteous.
|
|
|
Post by Nightspade on Apr 23, 2010 18:55:42 GMT -5
I'm just wondering when he's going to change his signature so he won't keep breaking those FORUM RULES he cares so much about. Hi Nightspade, The Forum Rules seem to be more like Guildlines now a days, then actual Rules. Since Dracko19 left, seems that alot of Rules have not been Inforced for a long time. And if memory serves me right, the last time someone make a False Thread about a Show that got renewed, but it turned out to be a lie, that person got Suspended for a Month or so from the Board. So, I would be very careful what you wish for. For it may just come True. And that goes for the Rules, as well as, the Title of this Thread. You Never Know, Stranger Things Have Happened. But with all that said, it's up to the Mods here to Inforce the Rules or not, and to Punish anyone on the Board as they see fit or not. Please and Thank You, Tony M. Victorino I didn't mean to say that I myself was holding him to the standards of the forum rules. I was just pointing out the absurdity of someone who violates the rules themselves suddenly turning to them as a tool against someone else. All the while not changing to follow them. That is called hypocrisy. But as far as creating threads goes, I can't really think of a rule that goes against this. The only one that comes to mind is suggestion that your thread contribute to the forum. This thread contributes. It has generated much activity and attention, be it positive or negative. I'd call that a worth while contribution. All of that is irrelevant since I don't need to prove the worth of this thread other than the fact that it was funny. It was a prank, you guys fell for it, and then instead of going 'lol, nice one,' or just not saying anything at all, you fed it. Great job. Any plans for the 7th?
|
|
|
Post by Twila Starla on Apr 23, 2010 19:14:18 GMT -5
But if he should respect the opinions of people who want a fifth season, then shouldn't you respect the opinions of people who don't? With all do respect Twila, I thank you for the defense, but it is unwarranted as my intentions are not righteous. I know, but people with double standards annoy the hell outta me. xD
|
|
|
Post by lordvictorino on Apr 23, 2010 20:01:39 GMT -5
Hi Nightspade, The Forum Rules seem to be more like Guild lines now a days, then actual Rules. Since Dracko19 left, seems that a lot of Rules have not been Enforced for a long time. And if memory serves me right, the last time someone make a False Thread about a Show that got renewed, but it turned out to be a lie, that person got Suspended for a Month or so from the Board. So, I would be very careful what you wish for. For it may just come True. And that goes for the Rules, as well as, the Title of this Thread. You Never Know, Stranger Things Have Happened. But with all that said, it's up to the Mods here to Enforce the Rules or not, and to Punish anyone on the Board as they see fit or not. Please and Thank You, Tony M. Victorino I didn't mean to say that I myself was holding him to the standards of the forum rules. I was just pointing out the absurdity of someone who violates the rules themselves suddenly turning to them as a tool against someone else. All the while not changing to follow them. That is called hypocrisy. But as far as creating threads goes, I can't really think of a rule that goes against this. The only one that comes to mind is suggestion that your thread contribute to the forum. This thread contributes. It has generated much activity and attention, be it positive or negative. I'd call that a worth while contribution. All of that is irrelevant since I don't need to prove the worth of this thread other than the fact that it was funny. It was a prank, you guys fell for it, and then instead of going 'lol, nice one,' or just not saying anything at all, you fed it. Great job. Any plans for the 7th? Hi Nightspade, I believe that there is a Rule Against Provoking/Flame Baiting on the Message Board. By Definition Baiting is: 1. Something posters do to gain post count. Posters post something dumb, waiting on other peoples posts so he can reply for some +1 post count. Also, posters can flame people as bait, so the person who was flamed will reply, and there will be a big argument, leading to alot of +1 post count. 2. An excuse a troll uses upon posting an idiotic thread or reply to a message board. Usually said after said troll is flamed and shown of ones idiocy. Just because a Thread gets a lot of Action, does not mean that the Thread Contributes to the Forum. Mostly if the Thread is based upon a Lie, in itself. Instead it does the opposite, it takes away from the Forum, in the form of Trolling and Flaming. But this is all up to Interpretation of the Rules by the Mods here. (P.S.) The 7th? If you mean Save Kim Possible Day, then Yes. Always. ;D E-Mails, Postcards, and Letters... OH MY!!! Please and Thank You, Tony M. Victorino
|
|
|
Post by Nightspade on Apr 23, 2010 20:49:53 GMT -5
I didn't mean to say that I myself was holding him to the standards of the forum rules. I was just pointing out the absurdity of someone who violates the rules themselves suddenly turning to them as a tool against someone else. All the while not changing to follow them. That is called hypocrisy. But as far as creating threads goes, I can't really think of a rule that goes against this. The only one that comes to mind is suggestion that your thread contribute to the forum. This thread contributes. It has generated much activity and attention, be it positive or negative. I'd call that a worth while contribution. All of that is irrelevant since I don't need to prove the worth of this thread other than the fact that it was funny. It was a prank, you guys fell for it, and then instead of going 'lol, nice one,' or just not saying anything at all, you fed it. Great job. Any plans for the 7th? Hi Nightspade, I believe that there is a Rule Against Provoking/Flame Baiting on the Message Board. By Definition Baiting is: 1. Something posters do to gain post count. Posters post something dumb, waiting on other peoples posts so he can reply for some +1 post count. Also, posters can flame people as bait, so the person who was flamed will reply, and there will be a big argument, leading to alot of +1 post count. 2. An excuse a troll uses upon posting an idiotic thread or reply to a message board. Usually said after said troll is flamed and shown of ones idiocy. Just because a Thread gets a lot of Action, does not mean that the Thread Contributes to the Forum. Mostly if the Thread is based upon a Lie, in itself. Instead it does the opposite, it takes away from the Forum, in the form of Trolling and Flaming. But this is all up to Interpretation of the Rules by the Mods here. (P.S.) The 7th? If you mean Save Kim Possible Day, then Yes. Always. ;D E-Mails, Postcards, and Letters... OH MY!!! Please and Thank You, Tony M. Victorino Flaming didn't start until replies started. I did not begin this thread by viciously throwing ad hominems at others, I simply shared a laugh. I don't see this thread as flame bait. I see it as... a conversation starter. And more spam on the seventh? No new strategy? Just more of the same mindless letters from the same dwindling crowd? Failure isn't imminent, it's here. Know this, when the seventh comes all your little e-mails will die at the hands of numerous spam filters. You letters shall be consumed by the countless paper shredders Disney keeps in their offices. Your postcards will be ignored, trashed, and burnt. All your hopes otherwise, all your thoughts otherwise? THOSE ARE THE REAL LIES. Your Hope is A Lie. No Hope for Your Cause. No Hope. You can Deny the Grim Reality No Longer. Your Anger can Not Fight What is. You can Not Bargain for What Will Never Be. Despair. Accept the Truth.
|
|
|
Post by Ashley Benlove on Apr 23, 2010 21:08:03 GMT -5
Nice use of the Kübler-Ross model.
*psychologygasm*
|
|
|
Post by drakkenfan on Apr 23, 2010 21:39:26 GMT -5
When I saw the topic thread I thought... Seriously? A fifth season would be cool.
A shame it's just trolling...
|
|
|
Post by millinniummany3k on Apr 23, 2010 21:48:34 GMT -5
And what a goof, I should have seen it myself. Troll tactic 271 I believe.
Post flame bait
Enjoy the replies it gets
Feed the flames
Chide those who do reply.
|
|
|
Post by Zephyr on Apr 23, 2010 22:02:49 GMT -5
I didn't mean to say that I myself was holding him to the standards of the forum rules. I was just pointing out the absurdity of someone who violates the rules themselves suddenly turning to them as a tool against someone else. All the while not changing to follow them. That is called hypocrisy. But as far as creating threads goes, I can't really think of a rule that goes against this. The only one that comes to mind is suggestion that your thread contribute to the forum. This thread contributes. It has generated much activity and attention, be it positive or negative. I'd call that a worth while contribution. All of that is irrelevant since I don't need to prove the worth of this thread other than the fact that it was funny. It was a prank, you guys fell for it, and then instead of going 'lol, nice one,' or just not saying anything at all, you fed it. Great job. Any plans for the 7th? Hi Nightspade, I believe that there is a Rule Against Provoking/Flame Baiting on the Message Board. By Definition Baiting is: 1. Something posters do to gain post count. Posters post something dumb, waiting on other peoples posts so he can reply for some +1 post count. Also, posters can flame people as bait, so the person who was flamed will reply, and there will be a big argument, leading to alot of +1 post count. I'm sure Nightspade created this thread to improve his post count instead of the possible LuLz it might create. Also, I really do believe he didn't expect his baby to take off like this! *Le GasP* It has became such a hot thread! And I'm also sure he feels like I do: ...maybe that part's just me. Pranks are not really idiotic, just the people who spaz about them. And I might arrgree with your next point here had teh Kim Possible side of teh RSnet not all but died, it did, and I don't. It is and always has been. This is no new revelation. And I'm sure the Mods Serge has little or no problem with this thread. You're welcome my little ankle biter!
|
|