|
Post by Zephyr on Feb 3, 2011 22:43:30 GMT -5
This message was deleted by the original poster.
|
|
|
Post by Dr. Feelgood on Feb 4, 2011 17:20:35 GMT -5
I like it! The whole time I was reading I pictured it as a Tim Burton-esque stop motion short. Good mix of camp and horror for my tastes. Only detractions were a few spelling errors, a few adjacently repeated adjectives, and the ending could maybe have been a little more ambiguous about whether "Daniel" really were the one who ate those people.
|
|
|
Post by Nightspade on Feb 4, 2011 18:15:17 GMT -5
So... was Daniel a hallucinogenic projection of the protagonist's cannibalistic urges onto a tool or a real machine?
|
|
|
Post by Zephyr on Feb 7, 2011 12:34:08 GMT -5
This message was deleted by the original poster.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2011 21:31:04 GMT -5
I felt like I was reading a Stephen King or R. L. Stine book! (I love both writers!)
|
|
|
Post by Dr. Feelgood on Apr 7, 2011 6:39:42 GMT -5
And they're both stinking rich (+ Burton makes three). Worth contemplating. I say leave the ambiguity in. Leaving room for speculation makes (most) readers more easily invested, and those who want to take it at face value still can.
|
|
|
Post by Zephyr on Apr 10, 2011 13:14:02 GMT -5
This message was deleted by the original poster.
|
|