|
Post by eoraptor on Feb 9, 2009 23:45:44 GMT -5
"the moral fortitude to wait?" Having sex is a natural instinct, a healthy and affirming act, and vital for the continuation of the species... take your pick on any reason there. There's nothing moral about not having sex before some arbitrary event set by a bunch of other people... when to have sex should be up to the two parties involved assuming they're mature enough to make such a choice.
As to will Kim and Ron have sex before marriage; In a Disney universe? of course they will. In a realistic universe? I doubt it, they're two very active teens who spend a lot of time alone together and trust each other implicitly. (battlesuit theft aside)
|
|
|
Post by ninjanaco on Feb 10, 2009 20:56:20 GMT -5
There's nothing moral about not having sex before some arbitrary event set by a bunch of other people... It's not arbitrary ... it's just that if you're going to give yourself physically to another person, you should have already given yourself to them spiritually, emotionally, socially, et al.
|
|
|
Post by slicknickshady on Feb 11, 2009 0:27:42 GMT -5
There's nothing moral about not having sex before some arbitrary event set by a bunch of other people... It's not arbitrary ... it's just that if you're going to give yourself physically to another person, you should have already given yourself to them spiritually, emotionally, socially, et al. I mean it's obvious Kim/Ron will get married. They will be the only sexual partners they will ever have. What's it matter if it somehow happens before marriage. If they decided to wait then i would be fine with it. I just don't have a moral stance either way on premarital sex.
|
|