|
|
Post by aliciamartin on Jul 19, 2006 10:11:57 GMT -5
great pics  |
|
|
|
Post by clayton on Jul 20, 2006 15:22:25 GMT -5
Actually that pic doesn'ty qualify as PG 13. The panties cover more of her butt than we usually see when she's in her cheerleader outfit and the only part of her body you can see is her back. Everything else in in your head.
The black dress tyhing I foun though is very nice
|
|
|
|
Post by Kimron Posstoppable on Jul 20, 2006 21:14:01 GMT -5
Actually that pic doesn'ty qualify as PG 13. The panties cover more of her butt than we usually see when she's in her cheerleader outfit and the only part of her body you can see is her back. Everything else in in your head. C'mon, Clayton. It's not just that KP's in her panties, she's topless, too. On top of that, the position she's in while half-naked makes that pic inappropriate for this particular thread. It's at least PG-13, IMO. |
|
|
|
Post by wallaceb on Jul 20, 2006 21:15:09 GMT -5
Actually that pic doesn'ty qualify as PG 13. The panties cover more of her butt than we usually see when she's in her cheerleader outfit and the only part of her body you can see is her back. Everything else in in your head. C'mon, Clayton. It's not just that KP's in her panties, she's topless, too. On top of that, the position she's in while hhalf-naked makes that pic inappropriate for this particular thread. It's at least PG-13, IMO. agreed |
|
|
|
Post by dracko19 on Jul 21, 2006 21:44:43 GMT -5
Actually that pic doesn'ty qualify as PG 13. The panties cover more of her butt than we usually see when she's in her cheerleader outfit and the only part of her body you can see is her back. Everything else in in your head. C'mon, Clayton. It's not just that KP's in her panties, she's topless, too. On top of that, the position she's in while half-naked makes that pic inappropriate for this particular thread. It's at least PG-13, IMO. Agreed as well and its not in a PG-13 thread so bye bye. |
|
|
|
Post by clayton on Jul 22, 2006 17:08:30 GMT -5
You have dirty minds
|
|
|
|
Post by Commander Argus on Jul 22, 2006 17:16:02 GMT -5
That goes without saying, but the context was clear in that particular one. I like DZ's stuff and I have a selection on my HD (sans the ones you know I'd leave out) but it doesn't belong here.
|
|
|
|
Post by liokaiser on Jul 22, 2006 17:20:37 GMT -5
Yeah even I know that series, it wouldn't go here, unless this was a PG-13 thread and well honestly it's just dangling on the border.
|
|
|
|
Post by clayton on Jul 22, 2006 17:28:48 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by clayton on Jul 22, 2006 18:06:22 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Commander Argus on Jul 22, 2006 18:12:16 GMT -5
Wouldn't that be a "K-Pod?"
|
|
|
|
Post by clayton on Jul 22, 2006 18:18:34 GMT -5
No... no it wouldn't.
|
|
|
|
Post by clayton on Jul 22, 2006 18:20:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by clayton on Jul 22, 2006 18:23:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by wallaceb on Jul 22, 2006 18:30:46 GMT -5
awsome!! Kim possible and invader zim, my life is complete |
|
|
|
Post by Commander Argus on Jul 22, 2006 18:37:39 GMT -5
Eh, the piggy nose on KP spoils it.
|
|
|
|
Post by wallaceb on Jul 22, 2006 18:42:06 GMT -5
Eh, the piggy nose on KP spoils it. yea, i know, that does not look a lot like kim, but who cares, it combines KP and Invader Zim, nothing else has to be said  |
|
|
|
Post by clayton on Jul 22, 2006 18:42:21 GMT -5
Eh, the piggy nose on KP spoils it. The joke is still good. What about the other pics? |
|
|
|
Post by clayton on Jul 22, 2006 18:43:24 GMT -5
 CLAYTON POSTED WHAT!? |
|
|
|
Post by wallaceb on Jul 22, 2006 18:43:41 GMT -5
this one  should explain everything |
|
