|
Post by JuPMod on Aug 21, 2007 8:22:13 GMT -5
I read the rules for this forum and I don't see anything that said this kind of thread is not okay. If it is, I don't mind the administrators locking it down. I placed the PG-13 warning up because there might be mature discussions going on here regarding certain art as well as the PG-13 content (No NC-17 content please!) seen in some art. Being a KP fan since April 2005, I've seen so many KP fan art over at DA (DeviantArt) that by now I pretty much think that I've seen them all. Yet I recently decided, for the heck of it, to do a search for 'Kim Possible' at DA, and much to my surprise, I've found art that I have not seen before. Oh, most of the art I've seen and have faved long ago, but it's refreshing to see art that I have not seen. I recommend to my fellow KP fans to do this over at DA, for one might never know what KP art one might find that is new to one's eyes. For me, I found these KP art that are delightful to me... Prom Kim by marcc78 - A nice redraw of the LBD Kim. Kim now wears a nice flowing purple evening dress. Kim Monroe by Ashamyn - Woo hoo! Kim with sexy legs and with her dress skirt rising up! Her pose is much like that famous Marilyn Monroe shot! ;D Nose Kiss by Porcelain-Requiem - Cute art of Ron giving Kim a nose kiss (aka Eskimo kiss). Awwww! KP Naruto crossover by FreshLemonade - Being a Naruto fan, I found this art fun. I particularly laughed at Rufus dressed up as Kakashi! ;D Kim Possible - Ron Stoppable by PatCarlucci (PG-13) - The title does not convey what the art is about, and no, no one is naked. Yet Ron actually points out to Kim that she is without her panties as he looks down her cargo pants. This art made me laughed and wondered this is the reason why she does not wear cargos anymore, especially with her new mission uniform. So, yeah, I'm having a great time searching for KP art over at DA. As I said, I thought I've seen everything, but I was delightfully wrong. Anyone else like to post KP art they found over at DA? I recommend to do what I did to give credit to the artists, and no links to naked art or NC-17 related art. PG-13 is okay as I did.
|
|
Fusion Fox
Pink Sloth
READ THIS POST IN A MUMBLING BRITISH ACCENT
Not a bad problem to have if you ask me.
Posts: 4
|
Post by Fusion Fox on Aug 21, 2007 8:28:01 GMT -5
Kim Possible - Ron Stoppable by PatCarlucci (PG-13) - The title does not convey what the art is about, and no, no one is naked. Yet Ron actually points out to Kim that she is without her panties as he looks down her cargo pants. This art made me laughed and wondered this is the reason why she does not wear cargos anymore, especially with her new mission uniform. Clever idea there ;D
|
|
|
Post by Bobman32x on Aug 21, 2007 9:05:42 GMT -5
Ive seen that picture PatCarlucci made a while ago and its still pretty funny. Its also very well drawn. One good idea is to hit up the accounts of users here. Almost everyone on this board who has a dA has done something KP related. And most of them (myself included) have links to their page in their sigs, or as their homepage buttons under their avatar
|
|
|
Post by Nulla on Aug 21, 2007 9:26:44 GMT -5
Ive seen that picture PatCarlucci made a while ago and its still pretty funny. Its also very well drawn. One good idea is to hit up the accounts of users here. Almost everyone on this board who has a dA has done something KP related. And most of them (myself included) have links to their page in their sigs, or as their homepage buttons under their avatar yea there are heaps of ppl on here that do heaps of great kp stuff on dA..... from what i remember i think i found rs.net through sifting through dA most of my favs ive seen on dA come from a few ppl round here including Levelord, SFToon, FaZhou, L7 and Sarah Ashley just to name a few, they're awesome ;D there has been some controvirsy on the removal of items as of late thou which is a pitty cos they were awesome
|
|
|
Post by Sarah Ashley T. on Aug 21, 2007 13:06:11 GMT -5
^Hey, thanks!
The one thing I don't like about DA is how strict it is. I remember I drew IvyMae a birthday picture last year, of Ron popping out of a cake naked for her. Of course, his vital parts were kept hidden beneath the cake, so there wasn't any mature content or anything. They took it down saying that, "You can't have anything suggestive with characters that are underage." I was like.. "wtf, that's HARDLY suggestive.. and I drew him like he was 18. I even made a note." Hell, aren't they 18 by NOW? I mean, they're seniors :X Lol. *sigh* And can never find new Monty fanart D,:
|
|
|
Post by slicknickshady on Aug 21, 2007 14:50:17 GMT -5
The one you're talking about Sarah I agree it should not have been took down. Especially with some of the one's that they leave up. The one art your talking about is not even close to being as bad as some. Heck it was not bad at all.
|
|
|
Post by wanderingslacker on Aug 21, 2007 15:13:16 GMT -5
Sensual PG-13 Shego in black lace on a couch. Her hair is absolutely gorgeous.
|
|
|
Post by Commander Argus on Aug 21, 2007 15:55:03 GMT -5
You can call DA strict all day long, but the better description is inconsistent. There is some unholy garbage on there, including stuff clearly depicting minors (and not ambiguously like a teenager on the cusp of turning 18) yet they take down pictures of Kim wearing swimwear.
I'm honestly surprised a couple of mine are still there.
|
|
|
Post by slicknickshady on Aug 21, 2007 17:03:31 GMT -5
the better description is inconsistent. There is some unholy garbage on there, including stuff clearly depicting minors (and not ambiguously like a teenager on the cusp of turning 18). That's the word i was looking for. Inconsistet. thanks.
|
|
|
Post by Bobman32x on Aug 21, 2007 18:36:57 GMT -5
sheezyart.com:) You know what though, just re-upload the picture anyway with a better description of why it should still be allowed.
|
|
|
Post by Nulla on Aug 21, 2007 23:44:53 GMT -5
^Hey, thanks! The one thing I don't like about DA is how strict it is. I remember I drew IvyMae a birthday picture last year, of Ron popping out of a cake naked for her. Of course, his vital parts were kept hidden beneath the cake, so there wasn't any mature content or anything. They took it down saying that, "You can't have anything suggestive with characters that are underage." I was like.. "wtf, that's HARDLY suggestive.. and I drew him like he was 18. I even made a note." Hell, aren't they 18 by NOW? I mean, they're seniors :X Lol. *sigh* And can never find new Monty fanart D,: that would of been so cool ;D - any chance you could link me plz?
|
|
|
Post by Yamal on Aug 22, 2007 8:31:30 GMT -5
The Naruto one and the latest one are really funny pics. Thanks for the links, JuPMod.
|
|
|
Post by captainkodak1 on Aug 22, 2007 16:20:43 GMT -5
There are so many KP pics and art over at DA. I have started the habit of doing a search by "Kim Possible" then clicking on the new button. That way the newest art is shown. Maybe some of you already did this, but it is a great way to keep up with the art being produced. Some of it is quite interesting.
As for DA, inconsistent is the main world and I'll leave it at that.
|
|
|
Post by slicknickshady on Aug 22, 2007 16:46:06 GMT -5
As for DA, inconsistent is the main world and I'll leave it at that. Yep theres some there that have no business being up. Seriously I'm afraid to even go to that site anymore. The search engine at DA is completely useless. I mean when i search for something i don't want to be exposed to the exact oppisite of what i searched for. I try to stay away from that site now. I look at Commander Argus and Cloudmonets. That's about it. I'm afraid to search as i said.
|
|
|
Post by Commander Argus on Aug 22, 2007 17:02:14 GMT -5
I partly blame an overly-wide interpretation and probably abuse of the term "Artistic Nude"
|
|
|
Post by fazhou on Aug 22, 2007 18:46:30 GMT -5
sheezyart.com:) You know what though, just re-upload the picture anyway with a better description of why it should still be allowed. Another deviantArt alternative: www.paperdemon.com/artw.phpI hear Paperdemon's moderators are extremely nice and deal with everyone on a personal basis (as opposed to issuing form letters when there's a policy violation). They host drawings and writing only; no photography. There's a special section called "The Red Curtain" that's reserved for the "PG-13 and above" works (that would likely be banned at deviantArt). There are many different categories of fanart, but no category yet for Kim Possible (maybe someone could start one?). Problem with Sheezyart and Paperdemon is, they're tiny compared to dA, so you wouldn't get nearly the same exposure or number of comments than if you posted your art at deviantArt. That said, the only real advantage dA has on the other sites is that their members can keep "journals," although it is a big advantage since it keeps the members in touch with one another personally (even if the staff seems high up on Mount Olympus or something). I think that if Sheezyart and Paperdemon added the "artist's journals" feature such as at dA, and make their sites easier to navigate, they would stomp the competition flat because they offer basically the same service for free that deviantArt charges "subscription fees" for.
|
|
|
Post by Nulla on Aug 22, 2007 19:23:30 GMT -5
sheezyart.com:) You know what though, just re-upload the picture anyway with a better description of why it should still be allowed. Another deviantArt alternative: www.paperdemon.com/artw.phpI hear Paperdemon's moderators are extremely nice and deal with everyone on a personal basis (as opposed to issuing form letters when there's a policy violation). They host drawings and writing only; no photography. There's a special section called "The Red Curtain" that's reserved for the "PG-13 and above" works (that would likely be banned at deviantArt). There are many different categories of fanart, but no category yet for Kim Possible (maybe someone could start one?). Problem with Sheezyart and Paperdemon is, they're tiny compared to dA, so you wouldn't get nearly the same exposure or number of comments than if you posted your art at deviantArt. That said, the only real advantage dA has on the other sites is that their members can keep "journals," although it is a big advantage since it keeps the members in touch with one another personally (even if the staff seems high up on Mount Olympus or something). I think that if Sheezyart and Paperdemon added the "artist's journals" feature such as at dA, and make their sites easier to navigate, they would stomp the competition flat because they offer basically the same service for free that deviantArt charges "subscription fees" for. paperdemon looks pretty cool, but i must say by lookin at dA, their system is quite mature and well rounded now. i mean all that pretty stuff you see pop up and all that jazz is some serious CSS + others doings there and is quite advanced. the other sites to add that functionality have a bit to do to catch up. and i thought dA have a mature content filter which disables people lookin in until they have an account?
|
|
|
Post by fazhou on Aug 22, 2007 20:36:21 GMT -5
paperdemon looks pretty cool, but i must say by lookin at dA, their system is quite mature and well rounded now. i mean all that pretty stuff you see pop up and all that jazz is some serious CSS + others doings there and is quite advanced. the other sites to add that functionality have a bit to do to catch up. and i thought dA have a mature content filter which disables people lookin in until they have an account? Apparently dA feels the mature content filter isn't enough, at least as far as cartoon fan art is concerned. When dA first introduced CSS it created a lot of excitement at first, but that has dropped off quite a bit, and as far as I know not many have wanted to buy a dA subscription just to get CSS capability. I use CSS, but it's a basic white background with a black font. I experimented with a few different varieties but found that most were either distracting or made the journals hard to read.
|
|
|
Post by Bobman32x on Aug 23, 2007 1:40:40 GMT -5
sheezyart.com:) You know what though, just re-upload the picture anyway with a better description of why it should still be allowed. Problem with Sheezyart and Paperdemon is, they're tiny compared to dA, so you wouldn't get nearly the same exposure or number of comments than if you posted your art at deviantArt. That said, the only real advantage dA has on the other sites is that their members can keep "journals," although it is a big advantage since it keeps the members in touch with one another personally (even if the staff seems high up on Mount Olympus or something). I think that if Sheezyart and Paperdemon added the "artist's journals" feature such as at dA, and make their sites easier to navigate, they would stomp the competition flat because they offer basically the same service for free that deviantArt charges "subscription fees" for. You can keep Journals on Sheezy as well. It functions just like dA's journal system. Ive used sheezy for 3 years. While it may not have as many members on sheezy, the chance of more people seeing your work is higher, as dA has so many things going up at once, it gets like 3 views and its done unless your one of those e-popular people. In comparison on sheezy, itll gather a few comments and more pageviews, which helps getting your name out, if only as bit. Plus 90% of sheezy users also have a dA, so once they comment on something you have, or you comment on something of theirs, go to their dA and make a comment there. Double your personal publicity:) And Sheezy is one of the easiest sites to navigate. everything is smoothly scripted in java where there are nearly no load times, and many dA subscription features are on sheezy for free, like homepage music, Image IDs friend shoutboxes, polls, ect.
|
|
|
Post by Nulla on Aug 23, 2007 6:47:04 GMT -5
paperdemon looks pretty cool, but i must say by lookin at dA, their system is quite mature and well rounded now. i mean all that pretty stuff you see pop up and all that jazz is some serious CSS + others doings there and is quite advanced. the other sites to add that functionality have a bit to do to catch up. and i thought dA have a mature content filter which disables people lookin in until they have an account? Apparently dA feels the mature content filter isn't enough, at least as far as cartoon fan art is concerned. When dA first introduced CSS it created a lot of excitement at first, but that has dropped off quite a bit, and as far as I know not many have wanted to buy a dA subscription just to get CSS capability. I use CSS, but it's a basic white background with a black font. I experimented with a few different varieties but found that most were either distracting or made the journals hard to read. true.... the css is a part of their 'complete' package.... with their entire content management system, alll the diff ways of communicating, bookmarking and categorising things CSS does help alot to bring the functionallity of the backend to the end user, and that is what essentially CSS does, not just the prettyness, but it give a bit more functionality to web page serving. but saying that alot of other places like sheezy and other complex web sites use all sorts of these technologies, actually not many sites dont use it.... and saying that, giving user end CSS abilities, can be a bad thing..... prime example myspace lol edit: ok enuf being off topic sorry ! ;D Sensual PG-13 Shego in black lace on a couch. Her hair is absolutely gorgeous. this is a really cool 1... like complete awesomeness ;D hehe good work for finding that one ! i wish i cld be so talented to do artsy like stuff like KP fan art
|
|